You are not logged in.

QT 1.6.1 64 Bit Integration in Eclipse Helios 64 Bit

Dear visitor, welcome to QtForum.org. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

flambert

Beginner

  • "flambert" started this thread

Posts: 11

  • Send private message

1

Monday, November 15th 2010, 2:53pm

QT 1.6.1 64 Bit Integration in Eclipse Helios 64 Bit

Hello,

I try it and i try it but it doesn't works. In the newest version of the QT Integration packet there is a skript ("build.sh"). I get always the failure:

Source code

 
1
2
3
4
5
6

In file included from ../widgetboxw.cpp:32:
../../shared/designerintegrationv2/QtDesigner/private/pluginmanager_p.h:32:28: error: shared_enums_p.h: No such file or directory
In file included from ../widgetboxw.cpp:32:
../../shared/designerintegrationv2/QtDesigner/private/pluginmanager_p.h:51: error: 'TextPropertyValidationMode' is not a member of 'qdesigner_internal'
../../shared/designerintegrationv2/QtDesigner/private/pluginmanager_p.h:51: error: 'TextPropertyValidationMode' is not a member of 'qdesigner_internal'
../../shared/designerintegrationv2/QtDesigner/private/pluginmanager_p.h:51: error: template argument 1 is invalid



Any idea? About the first failure I do not wonder, because the file "shared_enums_p.h" doesn't exist on my machine.

Best regards,
flambert

flambert

Beginner

  • "flambert" started this thread

Posts: 11

  • Send private message

2

Monday, November 15th 2010, 3:27pm

Ohh... I saw that the "build.sh"-Script is used in every version (32bit and 64bit). I thought that the problems apears because of the 64 Bit version. So my question: Did anyone installt qt intergration with the script or is it possible without skript?

flambert

Beginner

  • "flambert" started this thread

Posts: 11

  • Send private message

3

Monday, November 15th 2010, 3:41pm

Ohhh.... o.k. That way of installation affect only the "LGPL" usage guidelines. What is the diverenz between the "All editions" and the "LGPL" packages. Is the "All editions"-package an GPL-Lizenzed Bibliothek?